Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.
  

Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   
  

My Profile

Check all your messages, update your blog, change your account details,  find friends and much more on the My Profile section.
  

Regional Firms

Thinking of moving out of the City? Regional Inside Info gives you the lowdown on firms in Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester and Leeds.
  

Main Discussion

Rate it
0
Report as offensive
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:25
There wouldn't be such a thing as "Britain." If every country got rid of borders, the whole planet would be some third world sh*t shower, all speaking American English and probably living under a brutal dictator.
Brad's big donger
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:27
Report as offensive
3 ducks is conveniently ignoring all the other success story countries that currently have no border controls at all.
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:28
Report as offensive
My point is that it's all very well for the odd country to do it. If it was universal, we'd be in a whole heap of trouble.
saoirse99
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:29
Report as offensive
why?
Wellington
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:30
Report as offensive
I say get rid of borders but make flights into the UK about £50k a pop. Then we will only get the good forrins.
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:30
Report as offensive
No - then we'll just get the Russians. Fine by me, but the liberal do-gooders might balk.
saoirse99
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:31
Report as offensive
heh@wellington
SumoKing
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:38
Report as offensive
get rid of borders and also have state benefits kick in after 2 years working, tie them to wage, everyone is happy
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:43
Report as offensive
"everyone is happy"

Er...apart from the people whose jobs have been lost to a forriner.

The question of benefits is a complete red herring. A miniscule amount of money is given to benefit-seeking migrants and while it might be good Daily Mail bait, isn't really of any interest to the vast majority of people especially workers in low or semi-skilled jobs.
McLovīn
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:56
Report as offensive
Anyone who has lost their job to a foreigner must have been fucking useless in the first place
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:58
Report as offensive
Perhaps "losing one's job" was misleading. It's more a question of prospective candidates facing enhanced competition for future jobs from a bunch of extra people.
SumoKing
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:01
Report as offensive
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 15:43 Report as offensive Report Offensive
"everyone is happy"

Er...apart from the people whose jobs have been lost to a forriner.
__________________________________________________________

but if they lost their jobs to a more competitive native it would be okay?

or are you espousing a closed shop union thing?
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:02
Report as offensive
On a very crude level, there are 2.15 million EU migrant workers and 1.64 million unemployed (of which latter figure the vast majority will be UK citizens).

Even those who believe in World Government must allow for some sort of transition to avoid hurting the most vulnerable.
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:03
Report as offensive
Well, yeah. That's, like, the whole idea of a modern nation state.


SumoKing
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:01
but if they lost their jobs to a more competitive native it would be okay?
cockpit
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:04
Report as offensive
"countries that currently have no border controls at all"

Which are?
SumoKing
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:06
Report as offensive
great, so losing your job to a better candidate is not a problem, it's just forrins that are a problem

great, Dux

maybe this will shed some light on the stupidity

https://youtu.be/kxpf_bayjbQ?t=1m
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:07
Report as offensive
Svalbard, uniquely I think, has open borders, but that's a sub-national example.
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:10
Report as offensive
One has to question what the point of a nation state is if it's unable to protect its own citizens. Are you seriously espousing World Government? It's a laudable idea, but I thought that stuff went out with the Ark (or at least with the fall of Maoism).
Massive fuckwit
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:18
Report as offensive
Get rid of Common Entrance? It would be chaos and completely undermine the public school ethos of academic excellence.
Brad's big donger
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:19
Report as offensive
Ducks have you seen where Svalbard is?
Catherine Morland
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:22
Report as offensive
As long as they don't get rid of Australia's border controls.

Nothing to Declare is one of my trash TV faves
3-ducks
Posted - 11 January 2017 16:52
Report as offensive
I'm not necessarily saying I'm against World Government (or globalisation or whatever you want to call it), but we have nearly 200 years of Liberal Nationalism to dismantle first.
cockpit
Posted - 11 January 2017 17:14
Report as offensive
"As long as they don't get rid of Australia's border controls.

"Nothing to Declare is one of my trash TV faves"

Agreed!
T. Dan Smith
Posted - 12 January 2017 04:26
Report as offensive
I sort of agree with Ducks on this topic tbh
Cofferdam
Posted - 12 January 2017 05:57
Report as offensive
heh @ dux's frothing on this thread. It assumes that the world is falling over themselves to have brits grace them with their presence.