In an unusual offering to graduates, law firm Aston Carter is offering "paralegal employment opportunities" in its London office, which come with the promise of a funded LPC and up to 60 training contracts. All candidates need to do is enrol on a £9,500 paralegal course.

For the last week, the RollOnFriday discussion board has been abuzz with speculation about Aston Carter's paralegal scheme, which was first reported by Legal Cheek. According to the firm's employment pack (which has since been removed from its website), Aston Carter is offering the following:

1. A bespoke 6 month paralegal training scheme at a cost to the employee of £9,500.
2. Permanent, full-time employment after the paralegal course on £15-18,000 p.a.
3. Fully funded part time LPC (completed whilst the paralegal works full time at Aston Carter)
4. Up to 60 training contracts for the "right" employees.

So that's £9.5k outlay for a paralegal course rather than a £13.5k spend on an LPC, and apparently there's the possibility of a training contract at the end. So the maths might make sense, but the details of Aston Carter's scheme are rather less clear.

To put the promise of up to 60 training contracts into perspective, Aston Carter currently has just five lawyers on its website (and only four registered to the firm on the Law Society). It has SRA approval to take on only two trainees, and currently it has none. When RollOnFriday asked Aston Carter how it could support 60 training contracts, a spokesman said that the firm was expanding rapidly and would have 30 lawyers in the next two years. But no indication was given of where the work would come from to feed these new mouths.

Aston Carter has said that an independent organisation, Interedwise, is providing the facilities and tutors for the course and will receive the full £9.5k fees. But according to its website, Interedwise is a company which matches up overseas students with college courses and appears to run no courses of its own. RollOnFriday has been unable to get in contact with anyone at Interedwise.

To further add to the oddness, the firm has been trumpeting APIL and LEXCEL accreditations that it does not have. When RollOnFriday asked the firm about the accreditation it claimed that a member of the team was an APIL "resolution member" and that it had been "recommended" for LEXCEL accreditation. Aston Carter has now removed references to both accreditations.

    Spot the difference

The firm claims that 30 individuals have already signed up to this course. Anyone who would like to share their experience of the arrangements can get in touch (on a no names basis) at the usual place.

Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 22 June 12 10:50

the profession is really going to the dogs.

bet the SRA/Law Soc will catch up with this in about two years or so long after the damage has been done.

Anonymous 22 June 12 14:44

I am sure that the interviews were quite gruelling and that no prospective paralegal was asked to bring their cheque books with them to the interview. *cough*

Anonymous 22 June 12 16:26

60 TCs is the same as Eversheds and 5 more than Ashursts according to the stats on the Lawyer2B website...

Anonymous 22 June 12 17:37

Not sure about everyone else but I would love the chance to work with the Senior Partner, Henry Telewa.

He is an incredibly bright, cerebral lawyer, who has been described by professional and lay clients alike as possessing an extraordinarily robust wealth of knowledge of criminal law and practice direction. He has an uncanny ability to relate to a wide variety of social contracts in a way few other advocates can and thus is able to achieve unprecedented coverage within practice sectors.

According to his website.

Anonymous 22 June 12 17:41

Regulatory problem here? Their website does not say "authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority"

LauraP 22 June 12 17:49

At the bottom of the website:

Birmingham Office Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No: 510496
London Office Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA No: 535401

Anonymous 23 June 12 01:07

This sounds suspiciously like Aston Carter's expansion plan -
http://www.totallylegal.com/show_job.cgi?j=9262675&cat=24&ro=&l=&e=year&k=paralegal&lo=London&a=31&radius=1600&so=&ls=&sids=1&seids=&srpg=2

Anonymous 23 June 12 16:26

Laura, sorry to make this rather sad point, but I believe the new SRA requirement is that firms describe themselves as both "regulated" and "authorised" by the SRA - I know my firm changed its letterhead a few months ago to this effect, as it previously only said "regulated". I wouldn't say it's a big regulatory problem, but a little clumsy and slow.

Anonymous 24 June 12 09:36

The random capitalisation and apostrophe use on the firm's website is rather less than cerebral.

Anonymous 24 June 12 18:17

Anonymous 23/06/2012 15:26 - RoF speaks....Aston Carter corrects.

Seriously, I feel sorry for Mr Pubill their Marketing Executive. He really has his work cut out for him.