There were some sweaty collars at Pinsent Masons this week after one of the firm's clients was accused of propping up the Ukranian president.

One of President Yanukovych's greatest supporters is Dimitry Firtash, an oligarch who has bankrolled him for many years. And done very well out of it too: he has acquired a number of state assets since Yanukovych came to power, and was appointed head of the National Tripartite Social and Economic Council in 2012.

Firtash's business contacts are with Russia, and he has supported Yanukovych in moving away from the EU - a decision which threatens to drive the country into civil war. And whilst not quite in Assad territory, Yanukovych presides over a pretty brutal regime. Two protestors were shot dead by police on Wednesday, and the body of another was discovered in a forest outside Kiev showing signs of torture.

     Kiev yesterday


All of which makes for uncomfortable reading for Pinsent Masons, given that it acts for Firtash. While there's no suggestion that the firm has broken any rules in acting for him, City firms which take money from rich but dubious clients tend to suffer PR disasters as a result: Penningtons never lived down representing the President of Equatorial Guinea.

A spokesman for the firm said "it is not our policy to discuss client confidential matters. However, as an international firm active in the energy and natural resources sector, it is to be expected that we carry out substantial work for clients in Eastern Europe, many of whom will necessarily have relations with political administrations. As you would expect we follow strict procedures before accepting instructions from politically exposed persons and will decline to act if we have concerns."
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 24 January 14 11:11

The President is elected - the rioters on the streets (many of them avowedly anti-Semitic, white supremacists and neo-fascist extremists), are not. "Propping up" is therefore an accusation to level, not that there is any defence of the Ukrainian oligarchs needed, obviously..

Anonymous 24 January 14 16:05

Let's face reality. It takes an awful lot for any legal firm to refuse to act for anyone. They're not exactly run by Mother Theresas - although "Mother" would be an appropriate first word of two to describe an average big firm partner.

Anonymous 24 January 14 16:50

Yanukovych - is a criminal. He was convicted and imprisoned twice! Now he is killing his own people in numbers. Supporting and acting for oligarchs affiliated with the Party of Regions (his party) and his family - means - supporting totalitarian regime at the center of Europe. This must be stopped, otherwise neo-USSR is back!

Anonymous 26 January 14 00:10

Off the mark here, ROF.

Criticising lawyers for representing people you dislike is straying into dangerous territory.

Anonymous 26 January 14 11:30

Hmm. If law firms act for dangerous thugs surely it's reasonable to pull them up on it?

Roll On Friday 28 January 14 22:09

aren't 'dangerous thugs' also allowed legal representation be it in a civil or criminal sphere?

Anonymous 29 January 14 22:08

@ 10.03 yes, I think they do. Almost as big a joke as that gaudy mural in their reception.