Cambridge has been rated as providing the best law degree in the UK and the second best in the world. Only Harvard pips it.

QS has released its 2015 World University rankings. Three UK universities made the top ten (Cambridge, Oxford and the LSE) in a list that was dominated by the USA:

1.
Harvard
2.
Cambridge
3.
Oxford
4.
Yale
5.
New York University
6.
Stanford
7.
LSE
8.
University of Melbourne
9.
University of California, Berkeley
10.
Columbia University

QS says that it analysed 17.3 million research papers and over 100 million citations to get the results, and conducted surveys of more than 126,000 academics and graduate employers worldwide. So a lot of data has been crunched, although there are some glaring ommisions. Inexplicably, the undergraduate degrees offered by the big UK law schools are not included anywhere. So, despite Professor Provost President Savage's best efforts, it seems that the University of Tasmania has greater cachet than the University of Law.

     

And reputation is of course, to a large degree, subjective. A graduate recruiter at a top City firm would be unlikely automatically to place a candidate from Queen Mary University of London - 45th worldwide - above one from Exeter, Durham, Bristol, Manchester and Warwick that all ranked below it. Still, it's interesting reading. And The UK is, after the USA, the most strongly represented country in the top 50.
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 29 May 15 09:40

I wouldn't be so sniffy about Queen Mary University of London. The Guardian University Guide 2016 ranks it 3rd for Law, behind Cambridge and Oxford.

Anonymous 29 May 15 12:45

QMUL Law is definitely on par or better than toff playgrounds like Exeter or Durham. Poor show RoF

Anonymous 29 May 15 13:27

The point RoF was trying to make, fairly obviously, is that university reputation is largely subjective, not that Exeter, Durham et al are better than QMU. A graduate recruiter at a City firm is naturally prejudiced in favour of Oxbridge and Russell Group universities based on where he/she studied or where the majority of his/her firm's partners studied.

Anonymous 29 May 15 13:49

Well, QM is actually member of the Russell Group, so probably just a bad example to make the intended point.

Anonymous 29 May 15 15:29

It may be, but no serious commentator would dispute that it is appreciably more shit than Durham. Trufax. FAOD I attended neither institution.

Roll On Friday 01 June 15 17:29

QM Law is known as anything but shit, let alone 'appreciably' more shit than Durham.

Anonymous 01 June 15 22:44

Slow news week? These come out every year. The positions rarely change much. Including the positions of those mentioned. All I see is a cynical attempt to court controversy by picking at one of the universities which has been consistently rated in that sort of position for the last 10-15 years, but which rates lower for its other faculties. Making it a prime "it's better...not better" argument. Daily Mail sort of click/comment bait writing.

Anonymous 03 June 15 17:33

In terms of the top three in the UK, I think the QS is pretty much right. Beyond that there are arguments for UCL, Durham, Kings, Bristol and Warwick.