HMRC is seeking a judicial review of the SRA's handling of the collapse of Manches.

The firm's financial woes were widely known long before it went under. Although when RollOnFriday pressed the firm's Managing Partner about its troubles in July 2013, he said "we are seeing the benefit of a good upturn in our transactional business and our cost-cutting programme. We'll be announcing a number of lateral hires soon. Roll on Monday". Sadly he was talking through his arse - by October Manches had gone into administration. And Penningtons, which had previously considered merging with the firm, picked it up for a bargain £500,000. Its creditors were left with nothing.

    Manches' Managing Partner. How he might have looked.

Manches is not alone in going through that sort of pre-pack redundancy. A number of firms have done so recently, royally shafting both their creditors and their own staff in the process. The SRA could prevent this by declaring such behaviour is conduct unbecoming of a solicitor, and forcing partners to meet their liabilities. But so far it has steadfastly refused to do anything of the sort, allowing firms to collapse and their partners to reappear elsewhere free of debt and without a stain on their characters.

However this may now change. Earlier this month Manches's creditors were told they would be repaid just ten pence in every pound that they were owed and the taxman, which is owed around £4m, is clearly less than delighted about that. The Lawyer reports that HMRC has now sent documents to an insolvency QC who is looking into obtaining a judicial review of the SRA's supine acceptance of the liquidation.

When Challinors went bust in August 2013 the SRA told RollOnFriday that it was "well aware of the negative perceptions around pre-pack administrations". But in the two years since it has done absolutely nothing about it. If this judicial review goes ahead the SRA may finally be forced to change its behaviour and law firm pre-packs may become a thing of the past.
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 02 October 15 10:37

Hmm. Liquidation and firm dissolves, business evaporates, employees free to seek employment anywhere and creditors get nothing or administration pre-pack and creditors get part of the proceeds of a business sold intact which gives creditors a poor return (but at least a return of some kind) on their debt, the employees (priority creditors) continue to be employed and business value is retained - well done Penningtons for taking on all of that business risk. The SRA cannot force firms to pay more for a business and the "Limited", "LLP" or "plc" is a warning to creditors. If the directors of the entity have been trading unlawfully, then the eventual liquidator should come knocking on their door.

Law is a business - with business risks.

Anonymous 02 October 15 10:45

Isn't that just an invitation to firms that are currently in the "twilight" to pull the plug now, before the regime changes?

Anonymous 02 October 15 17:52

The morality of walking away from debts aside, I may be missing something, but how can HMRC judicially reviewing the SRA's "decision" to accept Manches' decision to go into administration when in reality the SRA was probably simply presented with the fact that Manches was insolvent, couldn't meet its liabilities and had probably already filed the Notice of Intention at Court? Even if the SRA had some prior notice of the intended administration, unless someone was willing to inject working capital into the firm, on what basis could the SRA have "refused to allow" Manches to go into administration? As ever, I may be missing something....

Roll On Friday 02 October 15 20:16

Didn't used to be so. Back in the day (and still the case for some of us who are sole traders) all those city institutions were professionals personally liable for debts.