DLA Piper is making 200 UK staff redundant.

18% of the firm's 1,100 UK business support staff are set to lose their jobs, with redundancies to be made across its IT, Finance, HR, Marketing & BD and Secretarial teams.

Some of the work they do will be automated, while the remainder is to be transferred to DLA's global service centre in Warsaw. In many respects, the writing has been on the wall since the firm opened its low-cost Polish centre in December 2015, when it piloted the global business services approach.

It's a grim day at the firm's UK offices, where staff were told of the impending consultation this morning. It begins on 31 May and will be completed by the end of July, at which point 200 staff will have to find new jobs. They are expected to leave their roles between October and next July.

    They stay over there, they take our jobs

DLA has received criticism in the past for providing only statutory minimum packages to those it makes redundant. However the firm has told RollOnFriday that this time, staff will receive an "enhanced" package, which will be nailed down in discussions with their employee representatives. DLA also said it would offer "career support" to potentially affected staff (though sadly not the kind of career support that involves continuing to provide them with a career).

COO Andrew Darwin said that the firm's rapid growth meant that "many of our systems and processes reflect the history of the firm rather than its future". He said a key part of DLA's strategy was to modernise its business service functions "in order to operate more effectively on a global basis and improve the quality, consistency and efficiency of the way we deliver our services to our clients".

Darwin added that, "Until the consultation is completed, we will not be making any final decisions, and we will be actively supporting our people during this process".
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 13 May 16 09:17

"in order to operate more effectively on a global basis and improve the quality, consistency and efficiency of the way we deliver our services to our clients" - what a load of PR BS. We all know the true purpose of this kind of cost saving exercise. There will be no discernible change in service level or price for clients, but the DLA partners' spouses might just be able to upgrade from an Evoque to a Sport. Sheer greed.

Anonymous 13 May 16 12:58

In defence of the firm (what?!), when they pitch, firms normally have to give some account as to what they can do to manage costs incidental to the service. Banks did this 20 years ago, and banks (as huge clients) don't want to be paying over the odds for service because IT support is being run out of expensive london offices, with expensive london employees.

That said - the impact of these jobs on the overall cost of fees is minimal. and banks et al won't see the chargeout rates dropping by 05%. The firms demonstrate keen cost awareness in offshoring backoffice services, and then the partners trouser those savings.

Law firms are very short termist, as partners today reap the cost/savings in the next financial year. The management has decided that they can increase PEP by (say) £3000, (1/2 of which is taxed) at the cost of more than a thousand people.

Anonymous 13 May 16 14:01

I started at DLA many years ago at a 2nd class employee (meaning a support staff, the guys with no brains who are not qualified solicitors apparently) and ... left them.
Today I advise large firms for their IT services and DLA like all these greedy firms are going to spend an absolute fortune for this transfer of their global services to another country (which is not a English speaking place by the way). Many muppets are going to be very well paid during the project, senior management are going to fly to Poland all the time and in about 1 to 3 years, the firm will rehire staff in UK. The same palaver did happen indeed with many banks when they offshored everything to India.
Over 3 years, there are no savings in fact.

Anonymous 13 May 16 18:15

I bet someone gave Andrew Darwin some sound bites: "many of our systems and processes reflect the history of the firm rather than its future", indeed.

Is this actually a law firm?

Anonymous 13 May 16 19:31

I missed something. This business exists to deliver profit to its owners by supplying high quality legal services to is clients. Where is there legitimate critiicism for seeking to attain this goal?
The progress of DLA Piper is a staggering achievement.

Roll On Friday 13 May 16 20:10

Piper the House Elf can confirm that he is not being outsourced to Poland; he is however being restructured in an efficiency drive, and will now have four extra arms, and an extra nose, so Master come more effectively punch him in the face...

Anonymous 14 May 16 18:26

Profit before people everytime. Once upon a time redundancies were made when a company was in trouble and they had to shed employees in order to continue. Now they're made to increase profits for the select few. Dress it up with soundbites, speak about increased efficiency but the real reason is greed.

Anonymous 17 May 16 12:19

Bet those partners are looking forward to acquiring their additional ivory back-scratchers...