DLA Piper staff have been paying an unusual amount of attention to its intranet after a staffer accidentally published a sensitive salary document.

The spreadsheet was mistakenly dropped into a shared folder accessible to all DLA staff. It stated the entire corporate team's current salaries and bonuses, fee-earner by fee-earner. It also included proposals for the amount by which each of the lawyers' pay should be raised. 

One employee who found the document and, naturally, pored through the details of his colleagues' earnings said there was a "huge difference" between senior associates' pay, "sometimes up to 25-30k". Calling it a "huge mess up", he said, "as yet it is still on there" because management "haven't realised". They did after RollOnFriday asked about it, however, and the document is now back under lock and key.

  The exact moment Brian discovered that a complete punk was earning much, much more than him.

A spokeswoman for the firm said that the leaked document was a draft and was not easily accessible. But presumably it still made for fascinating reading for those who found it, and is likely to make for some awkward conversations with HR. It worked so well for the BBC.

A DLA Piper spokesperson said: "A draft document was incorrectly saved in a folder that was not publicly available but could be accessed by employees. It was not found by accident, but as a result of a specific search. As soon as we became aware the document was located and removed. It had not been widely viewed or shared. Like most firms, we have salary bands in place for our fee earners which allow for some differences as a result of an individual's level of experience and performance. The firm is a meritocracy and whilst we pay very competitively as standard, high performers are also rewarded for their achievements."
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 08 September 17 10:43

After the 4 week (allegedly) shut down of all its systems do to a hack, this really does take the biscuit - a self inflicted data breach. Ooops.

Roll On Friday 08 September 17 12:04

"It was not found by accident, but as a result of a specific search."


translated as:

"Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have identified everyone who viewed the document, in time order, and will now systematically end their careers."

Anonymous 08 September 17 14:14

Quite right. Presumably DLA's DMS allows the powers that be to check viewing history....

Roll On Friday 08 September 17 17:53

" It was not found by accident, but as a result of a specific search." That is an incredibly nasty thing to say. They should not have posted it where they did. The fact someone found it is neither here nor there unless that person breached the Computer Misuse Act. If they were clever enough to find it they should be getting a bonus.

Anonymous 11 September 17 13:41

sometimes you can preview view the document without opening it so it won't show up on the viewing history in the DMS

Anonymous 13 September 17 17:58

A hero should absolutely leak the full list. Suitably redacted, replacing names with PQE banding.

Anonymous 15 September 17 02:24

Think it's not the first time inquisitive lawyers found juicy stuff from a firm's intranet / DMS, and most incidences where this had happened the lawyers involved would just be shown the door. Would be interesting to know what will happen to the lawyers this time.