A 69-year-old solicitor has been struck off after headbutting a property developer.

Philip Saunders was in the Royal Courts of Justice in London in April 2016 during a long-running land dispute with Mohammad Reza Ghadami. Ghadami blocked Saunders from passing him in a corridor and swung his briefcase at the lawyer. Saunders responded by headbutting Ghadami,breaking his nose and putting him in hospital. He was convicted last year of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and given an 18-month suspended sentence.

 

  Do you want some? Because you're going to get some. 
 


This week Saunders was up before the Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal. He told the tribunal that Ghadami had made an anti-Semitic comment and he lost his temper as a result. He said that he was "bitterly ashamed" of his behaviour and had not practised since the assault, but he denied that handing out a Glaswegian kiss in the middle of the Rolls Building constituted failing to act with integrity.

Unsurprisingly the tribunal disagreed. It found that there was no doubt that Saunders had assaulted Ghadami, and that whilst "fully understanding the explanation Mr Saunders had offered" it had no choice but to strike him off.

Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 04 May 18 02:28

One would have thought that failing to headbutt a property developer would be malpractice. Acting with such alacrity should have earned this fellow a place on the County Court circuit at the very least. In my opinion he should have been offered a seat in the House of Lords.

Anonymous 04 May 18 09:48

I am not sure why this should result in a striking-off, and I think the Tribunal should be called upon to defend its rationale. This is not a dishonesty or integrity matter.

Anonymous 04 May 18 11:30

So, someone swings at you with an object and you cannot take preventative defence?

Lawyers are fvcking pussies.

Anonymous 04 May 18 12:54

I though we were allowed to batter someone and just dishonest stuff gets you struck off. Very worrying.

Anonymous 04 May 18 14:07

every reason to strike him off - even if the recipient sounds like he deserved a head butt - hitting people in Court is usually frowned upon.

Anonymous 04 May 18 15:21

@13.10 I've read elsewhere that Saunders was not acting as a solicitor, he appeared in court for a personal matter. Maybe they thought as he was nearing the end of his career they might as well strike him off to make the point. It's still harsh though.

Anonymous 04 May 18 16:59

More solicitors should attack litigants in person. Maybe that would encourage them to go away and read some books before coming to court and saying that the rules shouldn't apply to them.

Anonymous 04 May 18 18:00

Anonymous @ 15:59 - I don't have a birth certificate or a tv licence and I refuse to be called by my serf name so I am not subject to any written imposition. I am John of the Smiths and I demand my right to trial by combat as laid down in the old common law.

Anonymous 05 May 18 01:53

Im sorry:

- Headbut which is nearly self defence in a physical altetcation/anti semitic attack = struck off
- Fare dodging on a train = struck off

- Attempting to murder wife = suspended
- deliberately driving car at someone in a rage = suspension plus fine
- Dishonestly forging court documents and letters to cover mistakes = suspension
- Lying in court/dishonestly back dating letters = suspended

Unfair