Clifford Chance has lost a high court challenge calling on the UK government to offer gender-neutral passports. 

The Magic Circle firm argued in the Administrative Court that Her Majesty's Passport Office is breaching the right to private life under the European Convention on Human Rights by requiring applicants to identify as either male or female on their passports. There are currently ten countries that permit a third category X, or unknown, on passports.

The Administrative Court upheld Home Office policy to deny new "x-passports" being issued in the UK. Counsel for the government had submitted that current policy was necessary to maintain "an administratively coherent system for the recognition of gender" and combat identity theft and fraud, as well as to ensure border security.

The Home Office reacts.
 

Clifford Chance and barristers from Blackstone Chambers are acting on behalf of Christie Elan-Cane whose "non-gendered" campaign seeks legal recognition for individuals who don't identify as either gender. Senior Associate Eraldo d'Atri, who has led on the Team-X case, told RollOnFriday that they were "disappointed" with the judgment as "unlike many other countries" the UK has denied "non-gendered citizens a passport that reflects their true identity".

d'Atri said that that despite the outcome, the judgment set a new precedent, since the court had for the first time recognised that the European Convention on Human Rights "guarantees a right to respect for non-gendered identity". He said that this is a "crucial first step" in the legal recognition of non-gendered people. d'Atri added that the firm and Elan-Cane are considering whether to to appeal the judgment. 

Elsewhere, there was good news for CC, as the SRA closed its probe into whether the Magic Circle firm ignored a bricklayer's allegations that RBS deliberately bankrupted his business.
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 29 June 18 14:40

The concept of X passports is just ridiculous, since when can you identify as one of the X-men?

Anonymous 04 July 18 17:49

This whole concept is totally bizarre, whilst you may choose to identify as any gender, you are either one or the other. There is a process in place for you to change your gender legally. Are there seriously people out there that wake up thinking I want to be male today, but I think I might be female Tuesday and Thursday this week.

Anonymous 04 July 18 19:59

No it isn't. It's been part of human thought and expression for millennia. The concept is readily grasped within Hinduism and its millions of followers whilst transgender people are evidenced in archaeology dating back thousands of years. The notion of people changing sex was something medieval people could easily accept, though some of the stories may more accurately reflect LGBT people being accidentally outed -,e.g. a woman turning into a man from the effort of jumping over the village pond. There is even a 16th century English inheritance case that depended on the beneficiary being deemed to have changed from a woman to a man. Transphobia is in fact a very modern ignorance & prejudice potentially arising from the collision of Victorian prejudice and bad science.

Anonymous 04 July 18 20:21

"Are there seriously people out there that wake up thinking I want to be male today, but I think I might be female Tuesday and Thursday this week."

Oh. And yes there are. And obviously always have been.

Anonymous 27 July 18 06:03

'The concept is readily grasped within Hinduism and its millions of followers'

Uhhh weren't hijras eunuchs? Maybe the meaning has transformed a bit since but I don't know for how long that category has had a more modern progressive connotation...