Follow RoF

For all the breaking news, follow RoF on Twitter and Facebook

         
   
  

Asia-Pacific

Check out this week's top Asia-Pacific news on the Asia Pacific Headline page.
  
  

Top Asia Stories 2016

Send Us Your News
Law student fighting legal battle to use penis as his official signature
08 January 2016
Rate it
1

An Australian law student is fighting a legal battle to use a penis drawing as his official signature, in a good use of student time.

Jared Hyams first scrawled a cock, balls and sprouting hair for his signature on an election form as a joke, but was informed by the frowning authorities that it wouldn't be permitted. Undeterred, Hyams included the phallus for his driving licence, proof of age ID and passport, but was refused by the grey suits each time. Hyams decided to take the matter to the courts and brought a case against VicRoads regarding the driving licence, but it was thrown out twice by magistrates. The Department of Trade and Foreign Affairs also refused the image on his passport saying it was "offensive" and "could constitute sexual harrassment".

The law student said that the various refusals "sparked something" in him, perhaps the ability to time waste. He continued to submit the scribbled penis and eventually managed to sneak the signature onto various ID cards, including his driving licence when it slipped through the net.

     
  A principled stand of some legal significance
 

Hyams argues that "what a signature is comes down to the function, not the actual form" and maintains that he'll continue to fight the authorities, no doubt taking great pleasure in signing any letters to them. 
Previous Story    Next Story >

Comments

Feel free to enter your comments on the news story below, subject to our terms and conditions. Please note that comments are subject to moderation and so will not appear immediately.

Please keep it nice. Thanks.

Order By:
anonymous user
20/01/2017 17:20
Rate it
2
Report as offensive
If guy feels that that signature truly represents him, who are we to disagree?