BLM was compelled to rifle through its rubbish after an employee was accused of dumping critical documents in the bin before she left.
The staffer, who until recently worked in the firm's Southampton office, failed her three month probation period. A source told RollOnFriday that on her last day she fed "all her court proceedings into the confidential waste bin including signed defences". And, they claimed, she pinched a copy of the office's client database, the "client matrix", on her way out.
However a spokeswoman for the firm told RollOnFriday that nothing important was shredded or nicked. She said that after a colleague "raised concerns regarding court papers being thrown into our confidential waste", the firm "checked those papers to be sure and found that everything placed within the confidential waste at the time of her departure included surplus drafts and copies, which were perfectly appropriate for the confidential waste". She said, "There was absolutely no risk to any of our case work”.
She said the firm also found "no proof that any documents left the firm". And that will only change when the sacked staffer begins tempting clients away like a cut-price Jerry Maguire. In the meantime, at least people noticed when she left, unlike the Managing Partner.
Tip Off ROF
The staffer, who until recently worked in the firm's Southampton office, failed her three month probation period. A source told RollOnFriday that on her last day she fed "all her court proceedings into the confidential waste bin including signed defences". And, they claimed, she pinched a copy of the office's client database, the "client matrix", on her way out.
![]() |
And her leaving speech had a lot more 'feck you you fecking feckers' than they usually do. |
However a spokeswoman for the firm told RollOnFriday that nothing important was shredded or nicked. She said that after a colleague "raised concerns regarding court papers being thrown into our confidential waste", the firm "checked those papers to be sure and found that everything placed within the confidential waste at the time of her departure included surplus drafts and copies, which were perfectly appropriate for the confidential waste". She said, "There was absolutely no risk to any of our case work”.
She said the firm also found "no proof that any documents left the firm". And that will only change when the sacked staffer begins tempting clients away like a cut-price Jerry Maguire. In the meantime, at least people noticed when she left, unlike the Managing Partner.
Comments
530
519
546
549
534
534
538
513
528
555
545
516
There was a Partner in the Manchester office who thought that scanning documents onto the CMS was against the Data Protection Act.
There was also an incident when someone on their probation period took a file home to work on during the weekend (as the litigated files she inherited had just been collecting dust for over a month).
When she mentioned it during a probationary review the Partners decided there had been a security breach, told the client and it triggered an audit.
No good deed goes unpunished there.
534
528
550
529
512
555
505
526
512
531
516
534
532
554
544
539
What do you expect?!! You have only got yourselves to blame BLM. Not bashing but just honest reporting and exposing a firm who are treating staff badly and causing havoc.
482
549
528
513
496
563
512
536
541
498
516
545
ROF, do another story on Monday about the Southampton redundancies - these comments are often the only place current employees can discuss what's going on. As a current employee I do wonder if we're circling the drain.
557
528
540
533
545
523
520
527
532
534
543
566
547
542
How can you say it's gone from strength to strength when Blm have lost countless clients Mod nhsla ageas to name a few. The have announced two batches of redundancies in the space of a few months, Gary Allison has left *huge warning* 9 partners left Southampton office last year( and the rival firm and still poaching) and all you can rely on is 21% increase on PEP? Are you accounting for year 2015-16 when it plummeted by 28%? So in actual fact your 21% increase doesn't sound that great? Pep is for Eps so well done them but what about the rest of the salaries partners, solicitors, fee earners and support staff? they are the ones breaking their backs whilst it's the EP losing contracts and now the ones that work the hardest have lost their jobs!! Ie the 26 people in Southampton which you have just denied happening! I'm gob smacked.
529
558
569
512
Do you have any other stupefying non-news of this nature to share?
Reminds me of a local newspaper headline I once saw: "Man escapes injury"
500
568
523
550
535
546
544
514
509
567
525
545
Don't worry we are all getting ready to go elsewhere but in the meantime we will just turn up and get paid as we can't be bothered to do any work. Time we took the **ss now.
532
533
512
550
522
559
557
516
510
533
489
555
517
531
535
540