Laz when you’re discussing how you respect women and their hard-won rights with your daughters as suggested on an earlier thread I recommend this thread as an introductory text to demonstrate.
That’s one possibility Laz. I think it’s more likely he was a sex addift the way Epstein is supposed to have been - I believe Epstein couldn’t function without having sex 2-3 times a day - got cranky and stopped thinking clearly the way you and I might from caffeine withdrawal. So it was probably just a habit for Simenon like brushing his teeth - dropping in at the usual brothel after work for a quick one
I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s done the maths on this, but faod 10000 is a new one every day for about 27 and a half years. Even accounting for orgies, etc that is some batting average.
It could, and perhaps frequently does, if one of the parties behaves in such a way as to dehumanise the other. But the act of having sex without the intention of creating a lasting bond does not in itself dehumanise. What a weird perspective. It may do quite the opposite. In the same way having a meaningful discussion with someone who you probably won’t see again is enriching (and indeed, that and sex often go hand in hand).
I've not my tongue a few times on your bullshit RR but this time thought I'd let you have it
By all means carry on posting your shyte but be aware you're a horrid sad little man and I don't give a fvck to engage with you on here again. Plus it's just fvcking weird
You've never bitten your tongue, ever. You throw yourself a pity party every time we interact. You've massively over reacted on this thread because you were pished. No harm in that, but please deal.
You now realise my post about Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't about you but in your cups you got confused. Nothing in my post that mentioned you warrants this response.
Bertha not engaging with the point and instead trying and failing to sound intelligent. How very rof.
My post addressed the objective and the subjective. My point being that objectively it clearly does not dehumanise, and for many people, in many situations, it does not subjectively dehumanise either - quite the opposite.
Eugenie made a blanket statement, implying that it always does so, in all situations. I don’t agree.
Tbf you have to be meticously organised to rack up those of stats.
You always think of French (I know he’s Belgian…) novelists being prevaricating and pontificating dillatentes, but in practice he must have had a highly disciplined regime.
I think the suggestion that I should have recognised that the situation was more nuanced that I acknowledged is entirely fair.
I’m talking to myself as much as anyone else. I’ve had a husband, and then a FWB and now I’m working back into something more serious. So rather inclined to spout affirmations perhaps.
For such a prolific swordsman in the days before penicillin etc., it’s amazing he didn’t contract any number of serious STD’s and die well before his 87th year.
0
3
Apparently 80% were sex workers
0
3
Oh, that's depressing
3
4
Is there a more egregiously inaccurate phrase than ‘slept with’?
2
5
I would fvcking love to bang 10,000 women
1
4
yeah I hate “slept with”, prefer “banged” or “fvcked”
0
3
Even with an 80% discount - 2000 women is pretty good going as I believe the lifetime average for men in this country is 10-12…
10,000 though - isn’t that essentially a new woman every night of his adult life or something?
0
5
suspect he attended loads of orgies where he ploughed ten or twenty in a sitting
8
3
Laz when you’re discussing how you respect women and their hard-won rights with your daughters as suggested on an earlier thread I recommend this thread as an introductory text to demonstrate.
0
3
Supposedly he lived with his wife and two mistresses and still picked up hookers and bar flies
How could he be BOTHERED
0
3
thanks, I’ll bear that in mind
I respect and am an ally of women and their rights but I also find them sexually attractive pls deal
0
2
That’s one possibility Laz. I think it’s more likely he was a sex addift the way Epstein is supposed to have been - I believe Epstein couldn’t function without having sex 2-3 times a day - got cranky and stopped thinking clearly the way you and I might from caffeine withdrawal. So it was probably just a habit for Simenon like brushing his teeth - dropping in at the usual brothel after work for a quick one
2
2
Epstein was a filthy raping pederast. We don't call Jeffrey Dahmer a human flesh addict do we?
0
3
clergs - what a boy tbf
0
2
Variety is the spice of life.
1
3
so his hobby was having sex with strangers
who gives a shite
0
2
Imagine finding that many people
0
2
I’m about 1% of the way there.
1
4
need to up ur game
5
3
Sex without love, or without the desire to at least form some sort of meaningful bond is kind of gross though. It dehumanises everyone involved.
Living your life as though people are disposable. That’s to be pitied, not envied.
0
4
Many people, mainly women, make great money for doing sex well and not for love.
Prudes can fück off. You're no better than incelgaga.
8
2
I’m not trying to sound like a prude. Morally anything goes between consenting adults.
But the habitual commoditisation of other human beings is a fvcking bleak way to live.
0
2
Live and let live but clamp down on abusers hard and fast.
0
2
10,000 is good going for a chap who smoked a pipe.
Apparently he resented his brother’ Christian’s close relationship with his mother, so the 10k may be a result of Mommy Ishoos.
0
3
I’ve got some delightful memories of being commoditised.
4
2
Odd overreaction. I don't see how Eugenie's post is prudish.
0
2
Agree, Eugenie
I think a lot of men, like Simenon by his own account, think sex is the only way to communicate with women tho
1
2
Meaningless sex is a great thing, because it emphasises the importance of meaningful sex.
0
2
There's meaningless sex and then there's sex bulimia
4
4
Oh look it's RR slagging me off when I'm not here again
What a sad bullying little sack of shit he is
Cvnt
3
4
Please accept my invitation to go fvck yourself you centrist dad bullshit w**kstain
0
2
10,000. That’s a lot de fumer la pipe.
0
4
CENTRIST
DADS
CENTRIST
DADS
CENTRIST. DADS.
1
2
I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s done the maths on this, but faod 10000 is a new one every day for about 27 and a half years. Even accounting for orgies, etc that is some batting average.
0
2
The Fokkens twins of Amsterdam notched up 355,000 sleeps but not as many novels. If only they'd been less attractive.
1
2
Easier for a bird though, as presumably she could do 3+ at a time...
2
2
3-ducks can do 9.
0
2
Other People’s Sex Lives
0
3
respect to the Fokkens tbf, that is some olympic level fvcking
0
2
100 years on the job and they couldn't afford to retire.
0
2
Risibly very visibly over his skis obvs
4
2
Is it me, or does Summer Sails’ post of 21:10 sound more rent boy than playa?
3
2
I read it as nostalgia for the close attention received from his house prefects.
0
3
“It dehumanises everyone involved.”
No it doesn’t.
It could, and perhaps frequently does, if one of the parties behaves in such a way as to dehumanise the other. But the act of having sex without the intention of creating a lasting bond does not in itself dehumanise. What a weird perspective. It may do quite the opposite. In the same way having a meaningful discussion with someone who you probably won’t see again is enriching (and indeed, that and sex often go hand in hand).
0
5
Tetchy boi had a few ales last night eh? I was tucked up in bed while you were screaming into the abyss.
0
3
Elsage confusing the subjective and objective. How very Rof.
0
2
The quirky, unique things which make each of us individuals have less time to shine through in a short term encounter. That’s all I was driving at.
5
3
I've not my tongue a few times on your bullshit RR but this time thought I'd let you have it
By all means carry on posting your shyte but be aware you're a horrid sad little man and I don't give a fvck to engage with you on here again. Plus it's just fvcking weird
0
3
You've never bitten your tongue, ever. You throw yourself a pity party every time we interact. You've massively over reacted on this thread because you were pished. No harm in that, but please deal.
1
2
No I didn't
I'm sober now and reaction is same . I wasn't pissed last night . It wasn't an over reaction. You're an obnoxious bellend.
Anyway done with you now and probably this place on general tbh
Over and out
0
2
You now realise my post about Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't about you but in your cups you got confused. Nothing in my post that mentioned you warrants this response.
Least believable flounce ever.
0
2
Teasing as gently as the head boy.
0
2
TBF, this can be a good thing...
0
2
Bertha not engaging with the point and instead trying and failing to sound intelligent. How very rof.
My post addressed the objective and the subjective. My point being that objectively it clearly does not dehumanise, and for many people, in many situations, it does not subjectively dehumanise either - quite the opposite.
Eugenie made a blanket statement, implying that it always does so, in all situations. I don’t agree.
0
2
wonder how many (thousands of) times those dutch sisters have teamed up to play the double ended trombone
0
2
The fact you don’t understand that dehumanisation cannot be judged objectively says it all. Fundamental fail. #trurof
0
2
I could probably have made more money for less being a rent boy than a conveyancer.
Sex in all its forms is pleasurable hence why I've rarely ever said no when the opportunity has presented itself.
1
2
tend to agree with sailo tbh although baffled by the level of offence taken at eugenie’s counter-perspective
0
2
Helluva way to deal with one’s midlife crisis.
I just wrote.
0
2
reckon you could probably boss twenty pretty ladies by next weekend Prodgers
0
2
Gaga telling royalty some home truths here
1
2
Gaga we all know rr is a massive fandango don't take it to heart
0
3
Gaga filled his nappy on this thread risky as well you know.
0
2
still slightly in awe of the alleged fact in th OP
that’s easily the adult female population of my home town
although if you couch it in those terms it sounds less like something to aspire to
0
2
Tbf you have to be meticously organised to rack up those of stats.
You always think of French (I know he’s Belgian…) novelists being prevaricating and pontificating dillatentes, but in practice he must have had a highly disciplined regime.
0
2
If we'd had camera phones sooner I think I'd taken a photo of every set of boobs I'd become acquainted with. Would have made a fun little gallery.
0
2
Bloody hell someone put 20p in Sails today
0
2
I think the suggestion that I should have recognised that the situation was more nuanced that I acknowledged is entirely fair.
I’m talking to myself as much as anyone else. I’ve had a husband, and then a FWB and now I’m working back into something more serious. So rather inclined to spout affirmations perhaps.
2
2
Cmon eug that's 9,997 to go! Better pull the finger out.
0
2
Interesting choice of words.
0
2
Pun intended (although not clearly defined)
3
2
For a while there I was doing a decent job of convincing myself that a FWB was enough, because Christ almighty the benefits were immense.
But it wasn’t, and terrifying as it is, I’m signing myself up for the codependency thing again.
Junk food is delicious, but I couldn’t eat it for the rest of my life.
0
2
This seems like excellent news. Imo the sex click is good but not the top click.
0
2
I could eat junk food every meal and often do at the weekend.
1
2
I love Sailo’s boob collage idea. Would you have it printed on a duvet cover?
0
3
Given the numbers of different women, I would conclude that he was absolutely terrible and not many returned for seconds.
0
2
For such a prolific swordsman in the days before penicillin etc., it’s amazing he didn’t contract any number of serious STD’s and die well before his 87th year.
0
2
Cushion covers. This would be the only legitimate reason to have cushions on a bed.
Join the discussion