The nuttiness of Everys Solicitors' site is one-note, but monomania is no barrier to becoming a Bonkers Law Firm Website.
There's not a great deal to explain about this week's inductee. Everys took photos of its staff and then published an index of only their foreheads.
Some staff didn’t even get #foreheadportraits. In seven cases only the scalps made it. One lawyer doesn't appear at all, just the Everys sign above her.
It makes the lawyers look like they're foreheads on tables.
Or eggs in wigs.
"Smile! Or don't smile, doesn't matter."
It really focuses attention on a specific zone of head.
Surely they'll change this.
Pure hair from Vine.
Somehow Vince's forehead says 'nervous'.
-Good use of depth of field -Shame about lack of face.
Perhaps Everys deliberately did not want to reveal its lawyers' facial features.
Exhibit 1: maximum forehead displayed yet not even a hint of eyebrow.
They played it very safe with Naomi. She must have high eyes.
Alternatively, the haircuts mounted a coup.
That is a take-charge hairdo.
'Martin's hair became Head of Private Client in 2016.'
All hair mutineers are welcome.
The perfect shiny cobbles.
The devilishly rumpled.
The shy.
Chapman's follicle voted to hide.
Going...
Going...
Gone.
Well done Everys. "We are a forward-thinking firm", it states. But also a forehead-thinking one, and that's rare.
Update: Everys has updated their site to show people’s faces/fought off the haircuts’ coup.
Comments
281
306
Looks fine to me. Probably just a browser issue.
292
283
I think they’re onto something. It’s much easier to look at than gurning faces.
289
279
I saw this earlier in the week. It's the height of my legal career that I found a bonkers website the week before it was published on ROF...
264
286
Looks like it's been remedied, or it was a browser/compatibility issue.