The University of Law made a net profit of over £14 million in its first year of ownership by a private equity house but, with magic private equity accounting, managed to record a multi-million pound loss and so paid no corporation tax.

The UoL, formerly a charity, was sold to Montagu Private Equity in 2012 for £177 million. £114.5 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill in the business, covering UoL's intangible assets such as its relationships with the law firms and the Open University (which, erm, ran away). However accounts filed at Companies House reveal that the goodwill is to be written down and set off against profits in annual £22 million chunks for five years (after which Montagu will presumably sell up).

So, in the year ending August 2013 the UoL was able to record an overall loss of £7.72 million and paid zero tax. And presumably won't be paying any tax for the foreseeable either, unless it strikes oil under Moorgate*.

    A former charity yesterday
 
The UoL says it also incurred a loss because it spent £1.2 million improving life for staff and students. The accounts describe how it is replacing 1000 computers over the next six months, making the internet run four times faster and has made a "commitment" to replace the antique boilers, windows and ventilation which have in the past alternately boiled and frozen students. A spokesman for the UoL confirmed that it has done all this while managing to pay President Nigel Savage the same as it did last year, a healthy £340k.
 
*And actually they'd probably find a way of accounting for that as some sort of massive environmental liability and finish up paying no tax ever again. And then claiming for breach of warranty against the seller for not telling them about the oil in the first place and forcing them to go to the trouble of drilling holes to get the damn stuff out, And actually probably then selling the oil to their own grandmothers at an over-inflated price, thus forcing the grandmothers into insolvency, but then buying their assets for peanuts in a pre-pack administration. And then selling those assets to orphans.
 
Tip Off ROF

Comments

Anonymous 14 November 13 21:48

£14m profit and yet they still screwed up the latest (November) round of LPC exams? Surely they could be using that to pay someone to proof-read the papers. Well, at least the shoddy paper writing provides an explanation why the goodwill is being written down so rapidly.

Anonymous 15 November 13 10:47

How is this a news story??

"Company correctly writes down goodwill in accordance with standard accounting practices"

Wake up - the investors and the company are in the business of making profit.

Who writes this crap? Did you voluntarily pay more tax than you were supposed to?

Piers and Matthew making donations to HMRC?

The student union is that way--------------------->

Anonymous 15 November 13 11:26

Whether it's correct or not, a private equity house is making a killing out of buying a charity that was established to provide legal education. That's pretty shameful.

Anonymous 15 November 13 13:47

The comments re. being naive about capitalism are fair, but the none-payment of tax over five years based on hypothetical 'good will' does need a serious examination and RoF is right to highlight it. HMRC acceptance of such a plan really makes a mockery of the system.

Anonymous 15 November 13 15:34

Sandgroper - why are you so upset? Learn to love more. UOL provide a course that lawyers have to pass in order to become a trainee. So of course news of them shamelessly raping the youngest members of the profession is news, coupled with the fact sexy accounting means their gains won't be taxed. I assume you practice these dark arts, hence why you are so excited. I would like to buy you a camomile tea and give you a hug

Anonymous 16 November 13 07:30

One wonders if BPP is so very different. But as BPP puts adverts on this site and UOL doesn't, I suspect we'll never read it here.

Anonymous 16 November 13 14:21

BPP is, and always has been, a privately owned business. The CoL was a charity. Spot the difference, numbnuts.

Anonymous 19 November 13 22:28

Wow, I remember the days when university and law school was effectively free. Now the law schools are owned by private equity, churning out way too many students for hefty profit, to supply private equity backed ABS law firms with paralegals. How times have changed.

Anonymous 20 November 13 18:14

It did not " spent £1.2 million improving life for staff and students."

I am a member of staff and all the new ownership has achieved for me is to take away my pension and make me work harder for less money with almost daily threats of redundancy.

Anonymous 21 November 13 16:51

A joke of an institution. They used to use the fact that they were a charity as one of their selling points.

Shame on the marketing department too for advertising that students 'will become top lawyers'.... they place accepts people with a 2:2.

Most law firms wont even let you in the door with such grades.

Top lawyer with a 2:2 - very unlikely.

Anonymous 21 November 13 23:37

Never mind accepting students with a 2:2. We are even taking people with thirds (and not from a good university). The only qualification that carries any weight is the sort you can pay to the director as a bonus.

Anonymous 22 November 13 17:58

And when loss reliefs don't work, how long before it sells it impressive real estate and leases them back - well, probably just before Montagu say bye!

Anonymous 22 November 13 18:01

Such as....

Let's save on salaries by using visiting lecturers - the money for which comes from a different budgetary stream?

Anonymous 22 November 13 18:25

Be fair everyone - I'm sure some of that £1.2m will be spent on staff with a 'manager', 'head of', and 'director' in their titles

Anonymous 23 November 13 11:49

An open message to the new management at ULaw.

Staff are totally disillusioned by the way we are treated by local management. Most of your Centre Directors are a joke - failed tutors who play at being managers and are as useless as a chocolate tea pot.

Wake up to the fact that we are damned good at what we do but are held back by muppets. If you want this business to be a success, ask staff what they think about local management and then have the balls to do something about it

Anonymous 24 November 13 06:39

If I've understood that correctly - I was taught by UoL tutors so it's doubtful - then if they know better why did these tutors not apply for such jobs instead? Probably too busy cultivating their talent of "reading things out for money". Not actually tutors, just superannuated presenters.

Anonymous 24 November 13 07:16

How can an anonymous message be an open one? Perhaps upper management don't listen because they don't know to whom they are meant to listen. Grow a spine.